{"id":606,"date":"2010-03-03T12:27:07","date_gmt":"2010-03-03T20:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/?p=606"},"modified":"2022-08-05T12:21:02","modified_gmt":"2022-08-05T19:21:02","slug":"agoura-discusses-ladyface-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/2010\/03\/03\/agoura-discusses-ladyface-changes\/","title":{"rendered":"Agoura discusses Ladyface changes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Agoura Hills City Council remained split at its Feb. 24 meeting as to whether changes should be approved to the laws that govern the Ladyface Mountain area south of the freeway.<\/p>\n<p>Source of this article: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theacorn.com\/news\/2010-03-11\/Front_Page\/Agoura_discusses_Ladyface_changes.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Acorn<\/a>, March 11, 2010.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_604\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/LadyfaceFromSE.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-604\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-604\" title=\"LadyfaceFromSE\" src=\"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/LadyfaceFromSE-300x195.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"195\" srcset=\"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/LadyfaceFromSE-300x195.jpg 300w, https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/LadyfaceFromSE.jpg 972w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-604\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">View of Ladyface Mountain, looking north-west, as rendered by Google Earth.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The council was asked to review an amendment to the Ladyface Specific Plan that would incorporate better hiking trail access, among other changes.<\/p>\n<p>If passed, the amendment will alter the city\u2019s development guidelines, including land use restrictions and standards for landscaping and oak tree preservation.<\/p>\n<p>Doug Hooper, assistant director of community development, said all approved parcels in the Ladyface area have projects pending. The amendments are designed to give planning commissioners and City Council members \u201ca greater level of objectivity,\u201d Hooper said in his report.<\/p>\n<p>Council members debated various elements of the plan, including whether some developers should be required to contribute to a trail fund.<\/p>\n<p>The plan also would require some developers to dedicate easements so people can access the Ladyface trails from Kanan and Agoura Roads. Property owners whose buildings in the Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan area do not require an easement might be forced to pay a fee equal to the amount of easements on neighboring properties \u201cout of fairness,\u201d Hooper said.<\/p>\n<p>The construction of new trails is not included in the ordinance, Hooper said.<\/p>\n<p>Some issues rankled council members, including a requirement that developers build their projects to LEED (environmentally) certified green building standards and provide bicycle storage, dressing rooms and showers as an incentive for workers to use the trails.<\/p>\n<p>Council members also questioned some of the parking requirements. The proposal includes a provision to allow owners of hybrid cars front parking spaces.<\/p>\n<p>Mayor Bill Koehler said it wouldn\u2019t be fair to force property owners to hire \u201cparking police\u201d and, even if they did, determining which cars are hybrids and potential energy-savers would be impossible.<\/p>\n<p>The plan also called for property owners to maintain the public parking that hikers would use.<\/p>\n<p>Brian Campbell, pastor of Gateway Foursquare Church on Agoura Road, said property owners who contribute an easement for the trails should not be required to pay any additional costs for parking maintenance or other amenities. He said the trails should be built above the water tower south of Agoura Road, not below.<\/p>\n<p>Councilmember John Edelston said he supported the requirement of minimum LEED-certified buildings, but that the cost should be capped on how much developers should pay. Edelston said the requirement for showers was impractical and could pose some health issues.<\/p>\n<p>Mayor Pro Tem Harry Schwarz said the intent of the Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan was to keep the mountain area \u201cpristine.\u201d While he agreed that hiking trails should be incorporated into the plan, he said that the council should make sure that the trails are connected with the other trails set forth by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy\u2019s master plan.<\/p>\n<p>As for imposing environmental conditions on developers, Schwarz said the plan is an \u201coutline\u201d for what the council wants in the future. Modifications can be made when needed, he said, adding that the cities of Malibu and Santa Monica have imposed the same conditions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is part of the public duty to help create a (healthier) public by creating trails,\u201d Schwarz said.<\/p>\n<p>The changes to the ordinance, said Councilmember Dan Kuperberg, are designed to make the projects better and probably more economical in the long run.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re raising the bar for ourselves,\u201d Kuperberg said. \u201cWe want to have the highest possible types of projects but not nitpick it to death.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Councilmember Denis Weber said he was against any requirements that would increase developer costs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the property owner wants to do it, fine, but I don\u2019t think we should mandate it,\u201d Weber said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTaking private property and placing public trails on it and then having the property owners pay for it is outrageous,\u201d Weber said.<\/p>\n<p>The council will vote on the amendment at its first meeting in April.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Agoura Hills City Council remained split at its Feb. 24 meeting as to whether changes should be approved to the laws that govern the Ladyface Mountain area south of the freeway. Source of this article: The Acorn, March 11, 2010. The council was asked to review an amendment to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,35,6,29,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conejo-valley","category-development","category-hiking","category-politics","category-trail-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=606"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3772,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions\/3772"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}