{"id":2415,"date":"2022-05-09T12:40:17","date_gmt":"2022-05-09T19:40:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/?p=2415"},"modified":"2022-05-11T12:54:22","modified_gmt":"2022-05-11T19:54:22","slug":"california-covid-19-deaths-near-90000-but-the-per-capita-rate-is-among-lowest-in-u-s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/2022\/05\/09\/california-covid-19-deaths-near-90000-but-the-per-capita-rate-is-among-lowest-in-u-s\/","title":{"rendered":"California COVID-19 deaths near 90,000, but the per capita rate is among lowest in U.S."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source of this article, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/california\/story\/2022-05-09\/california-nears-90-000-covid-19-death-toll\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/sars-cov-19.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/sars-cov-19-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2416 alignright\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/sars-cov-19-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/sars-cov-19-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/sars-cov-19.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>California\u2019s COVID-19 death toll is on the cusp of 90,000, a tally that comes as the U.S. is nearing its own milestone of 1 million deaths.<\/p>\n<p>As of Friday, California had reported 89,851 cumulative deaths since the start of the pandemic, up 269 from the previous week. At this pace, the state is likely to surpass 90,000 COVID-19 fatalities this week.<\/p>\n<p>No state has suffered more total pandemic-related deaths than California. However, on a per capita basis, California has the 11th-lowest cumulative COVID-19 death rate \u2014 with <strong>229.5<\/strong> deaths for every 100,000 residents, according to data compiled by The Times. Roughly a year ago, a similar analysis revealed California had the 22nd lowest cumulative COVID-19 death rate of any state.<\/p>\n<p>California also now has the lowest cumulative COVID-19 death rate of the nation\u2019s 10 most populous states. By comparison, the cumulative COVID-19 death rate in Florida is <strong>359.4<\/strong> per 100,000 residents. In New York, it\u2019s <strong>348.8<\/strong>; and in Texas, it\u2019s <strong>316.1<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Webmaster&#8217;s note: I&#8217;ve decided to include this article because there&#8217;s so much misinformation being tossed around about COVID outcomes in various states. It&#8217;s common for COVID deniers and vaccine skeptics to claim that laissez faire states like Florida and Texas have done just as well as states like California with its more intrusive regulations. As this article shows, that is wrong. Also, it&#8217;s important to remember that New York and New Jersey fared really poorly at the onset because of the huge initial surge in cases, especially among older people, and the lack of knowledge by physicians on how to treat the disease. Other states subsequently learned from New York&#8217;s experience and did better.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>The worst rate can be found in Arizona, where the total reported death toll \u2014 just under 30,200 \u2014 amounts to <strong>434.6<\/strong> fatalities for every 100,000 residents.<\/p>\n<p>If Arizona had experienced California\u2019s same death rate, about 14,000 fewer people would\u2019ve died from COVID-19 to this point. And if California had Arizona\u2019s death rate, the Golden State would\u2019ve seen 170,000 people perish from COVID-19, instead of the nearly 90,000 reported so far.<\/p>\n<p>The wide divergence in death rates demonstrates just how differently the pandemic has played out in varying corners of the country. California, for example, has one of the nation\u2019s better vaccination rates \u2014 with 72% of residents of all ages having completed their primary vaccination series. In Arizona, 62% of residents have done likewise, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.<\/p>\n<p>Of vaccinated adults who have completed their primary vaccination series, 56% in California have received their first booster shot, while 45% have done so in Arizona.<\/p>\n<p>Health officials have routinely said getting vaccinated and boosted provides robust protection against the worst of COVID-19. According to the most recent data from the California Department of Public Health, unvaccinated residents remain roughly nine times more likely to die from COVID-19 than those who have been fully vaccinated and boosted.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House COVID-19 task force coordinator, said on ABC\u2019s \u201cThis Week\u201d that the \u201csurge of infections\u201d seen in the Northeast has not resulted in a big spike in deaths \u201cbecause the population is so well vaccinated and boosted. That\u2019s not true for the whole country.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While vaccinations and booster shots dramatically reduce risk, they don\u2019t eliminate it, including lasting effects such as long COVID and higher risk among COVID survivors for heart disease and diabetes. Officials and experts say it\u2019s also prudent to take sensible measures to reduce infection risks, such as wearing masks in indoor public settings.<\/p>\n<p>Two of California\u2019s major metropolises \u2014 Los Angeles County and much of the San Francisco Bay Area \u2014 reinstituted mask mandates last summer that were lifted before the start of spring. That meant universal masking was still customary across large swaths of the state\u2019s most populated areas as the Omicron surge roared to life.<\/p>\n<p>Some local officials believe masking helped reduce the severity of the most recent wave.<\/p>\n<p>While the fall-and-winter Omicron surge has faded, California and the rest of the nation are now facing a second increase in Omicron cases. How bad it will get \u2014 in terms of hospitalizations and deaths \u2014 remains unclear.<\/p>\n<p>California has continued to observe an increase in new weekly coronavirus cases. Over the last week, the state averaged about 7,300 new coronavirus cases a day \u2014 up from about 6,200 the previous week. That\u2019s a 17% increase in the week-over-week case rate, but it\u2019s more modest compared to the prior week, when there was a 33% increase in the weekly case rate.<\/p>\n<p>While that could be a sign of a possible plateau, it\u2019s too soon to say.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, the rate of increase is far slower than during the first Omicron spike, when cases sometimes jumped by more than 100% from week to week.<\/p>\n<p>Coronavirus-positive hospitalizations in L.A. County and the San Francisco Bay Area have remained stable or are ticking up only slightly, and officials haven\u2019t expressed alarm at the trends. As of Saturday, there were 1,185 coronavirus-positive patients in hospitals in California, up from 1,035 from the prior week.<\/p>\n<p>In L.A. County, coronavirus-positive hospitalizations have remained relatively stable for the last three weeks, hovering roughly between 210 and 260 \u2014 among the lowest numbers of the entire pandemic.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile cases have been steadily increasing, we are relieved that our test positivity rate has only gone up slightly, and that COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths have remained relatively stable,\u201d L.A. County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer said last week.<\/p>\n<p>And in San Francisco, health director Dr. Grant Colfax said that despite the city\u2019s relatively high case rate, hospitalizations were low.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think this reflects our relatively high immunity levels in the community, as well as the fact that we have a high booster rate,\u201d Colfax told city health commissioners last week.<\/p>\n<p>Other experts, however, have expressed concern at the high case rates in the Bay Area. San Francisco has one of the state\u2019s worst rates, at 278 weekly cases for every 100,000 residents. By comparison, L.A. County is reporting 144 weekly coronavirus cases for every 100,000 residents. A rate of 100 or higher is considered a high rate of transmission, the worst category as defined by the CDC.<\/p>\n<p>And while L.A. County\u2019s test positivity rate is just above 2%, San Francisco\u2019s rate is 8%. San Francisco\u2019s high rate may be because of greater testing that gets reported to officials, \u201cbut it is concerning,\u201d Dr. George Rutherford, a UC San Francisco epidemiologist and infectious diseases expert, told colleagues at a campus town hall meeting Friday.<\/p>\n<p>In previous weeks, experts have expressed a relative degree of optimism that people who survived an earlier Omicron infection \u2014 from the subvariant known as BA.1 \u2014 in December and January were probably protected against a second Omicron subvariant, BA.2, that has emerged.<\/p>\n<p>But these Omicron survivors may not be as well protected against a reinfection with the latest even-more-contagious Omicron subvariant, BA.2.12.1, Rutherford warned. BA.2.12.1 is about 25% more contagious than BA.2, which is about 30% more contagious than the first Omicron subvariant BA.1.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBA.2.12.1 also has some mutations that make it less susceptible to neutralization by antibodies from people with prior infection \u2014specifically people who are infected in December and January with the BA.1 strains,\u201d Rutherford said.<\/p>\n<p>Still, Rutherford did say national data suggest there are fewer coronavirus-positive hospitalizations for every coronavirus case than in prior periods. Hospitalizations have gone up nationally at a more modest pace than cases.<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with The Times, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said that, despite the recent increases: \u201cOur cases are relatively low, our hospitalizations are relatively low and our deaths are actually quite low.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat said, our cases have gone up week over week for the last couple of weeks, our hospitalizations have gone up week over week for the last couple of weeks, and our deaths are still too high,\u201d she said. \u201cSo we are in a phase of the pandemic where we need to be cautious.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rutherford said he still does not expect the current increase in coronavirus cases to approach the levels seen in December and January. He recommended that people eligible for the second booster get it; he suggested that people planning trips this summer get a second booster about two weeks before traveling. But for people without plans, he suggested they get the additional shot promptly.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThink of the [additional benefits provided by the] second booster as lasting for about two months. So if you\u2019re going to travel somewhere this summer, try and time it so that you get it a couple of weeks before your [increased] exposure starts,\u201d Rutherford said. \u201cIf you\u2019re not going anywhere, get it now.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source of this article, the Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2022 California\u2019s COVID-19 death toll is on the cusp of 90,000, a tally that comes as the U.S. is nearing its own milestone of 1 million deaths. As of Friday, California had reported 89,851 cumulative deaths since the start of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2416,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,73,20,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-california","category-covid-19","category-health","category-national"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2415"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2415\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2417,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2415\/revisions\/2417"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venturacountytrails.org\/WP\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}