
NATURE VS. NEIGHBORHOODS: Housing and development are creeping up to the bluffs of Red Mountain in St. George. (Mark Boster / LAT).
Source of this article - Los Angeles Times, June 6, 2006.
Proceeds from U.S. acreage outside Zion park would be used for local development.![]() NATURE VS. NEIGHBORHOODS: Housing and development are creeping up to the bluffs of Red Mountain in St. George. (Mark Boster / LAT). |
Julie Cart
ST. GEORGE, Utah — Its mild climate, stunning scenery and proximity to several national parks have helped make Washington County one of the five fastest-growing counties in the nation. But like many rural Western counties, it has little room to expand: 87% of its land is owned by the federal government.![]() POSTCARD PRETTY: A panoramic view of St. George, Utah taken from the St. George airport looking towards the red rocks of Zion National Park. (Mark Boster / LAT) |
The
Washington County plan and others like it highlight the growing tension between
growth advocates and others who fear that the West's unique legacy of protected
public land is in jeopardy along with the wildlife, clean air and water that go
with it.
Although the Washington County bill would address conservation
by expanding a preserve for the threatened desert tortoise and designating
219,000 acres as wilderness, environmental groups point out that more than half
of that acreage is already strictly protected as part of nearby Zion National
Park. Most of the remaining acreage is already managed as wilderness.
"As far as wilderness is concerned, this is a miserable piece of
legislation," said Scott Groene, executive director of the Southern Utah
Wilderness Alliance.
The reaction from neighboring counties has been
enthusiastic.
"This is, my own opinion, a great model for how to deal
with public lands," said Mark Whitney, chairman of the neighboring Beaver County
Commission. "I think it puts a lot of these federal land issues to bed. This is
landmark."
Washington County's population has grown more than 40% since
2000. Retirees, in particular, have been drawn to southern Utah with its red
rock palisades and deep, lush canyons. St. George, moreover, is an easy drive
from both Las Vegas and the Grand Canyon.
But the same scenery that
attracts growth can impede it when so much of the countryside is off limits to
development, officials say.
"One of the problems in the West is that the
federal government owns most of the land," said James Eardley, who chairs the
Washington County Commission. "I say, 'He who owns the land, holds the power.'
"
![]() WILD OASIS: A backpacker crosses a bridge over the Virgin River in Zion National Park. Utah Senator Bob Bennett has proposed a bill that would require the sale of 25,000 acres of public land. (Mark Boster / LAT) |
As far as he's concerned, Eardley said, the Washington County bill is
about one thing: "We're in it for the land."
The bill is coming at a
time when the Bush administration is advocating the sale of hundreds of
thousands of acres of federal land in the region. The president's most recent
budget requires the U.S. Forest Service to sell 300,000 acres and the Bureau of
Land Management to raise $350 million by auctioning some of its vast
holdings.
For conservationists, however, the bill is part of a dangerous
trend.
"People hoorah these projects on the local level, saying, 'We are
going to do this for our people,' " said Janine Blaeloch, director of the
Western Lands Project, a Seattle-based group that monitors the sale of federal
lands. "But small groups benefit, and those are developers, paving companies and
golf course developers. Where federal land has been taken over for development,
it ends up being used for second homes and high-end development."
The
Washington County bill follows a precedent set by 2004 legislation in Nevada,
sponsored by Democratic Sen. Harry Reid, that not only ordered the sale of
federal land but allowed local governments to reap the proceeds, rather than
sending the money to the federal Treasury.
Under the Washington County
bill, up to 25,000 acres of federal land would be auctioned off. Fifteen percent
of the total proceeds, which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars,
would be doled out to county agencies, with the remaining 85% earmarked for
local conservation projects, such as adding land to the tortoise preserve.
Most of the land ordered for sale has not been identified, but according
to Jim Crisp, manager of the BLM's St. George field office, finding 25,000 acres
of agency land without disturbing either an endangered species or an
archeological or cultural site would be challenging.
![]() LUXURY HOUSING: One of the new homes under construction in The Reserve in Ivins, Utah, a suburb of St. George, features a man-made waterfall and stream. (Mark Boster / LAT). |
More than 50% of the
federal land in the region contains artifacts that make it unsuitable for sale,
Crisp said.
The bill would help the Washington County Water Conservancy
District fund a $500-million pipeline that would convey water from Lake Powell
120 miles to St. George, a city of about 70,000 where the per capita consumption
of water is already twice the national average.
Additionally, the water
district would be guaranteed rights of way, easements and the right to put
reservoirs, storage sites, flood-control projects and pump sites on 14 squares
miles of public land, free of charge.
The most controversial part of the
bill involves the 66,000-acre tortoise preserve and the people who stand to
benefit from it. The bill would establish a fund that would allow James Doyle, a
developer, to realize a multimillion-dollar profit on land he owns in the
tortoise preserve. Among the priority projects to be funded by the land auction
would be buying out private landowners within the preserve
boundaries.
Shortly after Doyle bought the property in 1990, the land was
designated as critical habitat for the endangered desert tortoise. The BLM began
to acquire land from private property owners to consolidate into a tortoise
preserve.
![]() The bright pink flowers of a prickly pear cactus bloom in the desert tortoise preserve area in St. George. The landbill would create a pipeline from Lake Powell to St. George and enlarge a desert tortoise preserve. (Mark Boster / LAT). |
During that period, Doyle refused to accept the BLM's
appraisal of $28 million, 25 times more than he had paid for his property. Doyle
hired his own appraiser, who set a value of about $70 million. Years of
wrangling ensued, including a 2001 inspector general's report that found
successive federal appraisals of Doyle's land had been excessively high.
Doyle hired a succession of Washington lobbyists, including former U.S.
Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, to lobby both the Clinton and Bush
administrations to resolve the impasse.
Twice, Bennett introduced
unsuccessful bills to pay Doyle market value for his land. Additionally, former
U.S. Rep. James Hansen of Utah helped Doyle by attaching a rider to a 1996 parks
bill that specifically allowed land within the Washington County desert tortoise
preserve to be appraised as if it could be fully developed, unencumbered by the
restrictions of the Endangered Species Act.
Although applauding the
effort and expense to enlarge the tortoise preserve, critics wonder why the
legislation calls for a highway to run through the newly protected area. The
bypass would enhance the value of high-end housing developments on the
preserve's edge by reducing driving time into St. George.
Among those
owning property affected by the new road: Washington County Commissioner Alan
Gardner and his brother, Larry, a St. George city councilman.
Randy
Johnson, a former Utah county commissioner who acted as the mediator during the
bill's negotiations, said conflicts of interest were inevitable in a small
county.
"I don't know how to tell you a way for us to do a comprehensive,
complex countywide land-use bill without finding some complications," he said.
"You are going to have people who own land here and there; you are going to have
people who benefit one way or another. But there was never an effort to
structure the bill that any one person would benefit."
Soon after
finishing his stint as the bill's facilitator, Johnson went on Washington
County's payroll as a consultant.
Although Washington County officials
denied they had undue influence on the bill's outcome, County Commissioner
Gardner added: "If there was no benefit for the county in the bill, why go to
all that effort?"